What can get the BBC to tone down its LGBT propaganda? The abolition of the licence fee

To look at the BBC news website is to look at propaganda for LGBT ism. 

Just like Pravda ceaselessly told the citizens of the Soviet Union that the West was doomed; just like Der Sturmer drummed its anti-Semitism into the Germans, so now the BBC – oh, so politely – is dripping into our minds the crass idea that homosexuality is progressive and so its opposite, traditional marriage, is backward.

Hardly a day goes by without there being a story on the BBC promoting the glories of LGBT ism.

Here is what’s been on offer just in the last few days (19/2/2020 - 24/2/2020)

It is nearly two major pro LGBT stories every day

February 19^th:

Story about two LGBT teachers who resigned from a Catholic school which caused a protest. Gays and Catholics…what’s new?

A programme on how much we know about LGBT history.

February 20^th:

The teachers (again).

A podcast about LGBT ism in sport.

February 21^st:

A story about the Arnos Vale cemetery apparently revealing LGBT stories. It didn’t say much, but for the propagandist the title does the job.

‘I hated my homophobic stepdad, then he came out’ That’s the story, and it is promoting a film. Search me why this should be of national interest.

February 23^rd

A programme about LGBT and Catholics.

February 24^th

A programme about how gay men feel about watching football.

A story entirely supportive of a drag queen visiting a primary school in Paisley.

Before someone starts saying, well, LGBT ism is a very important issue and it’s quite right for the BBC to give it such prominence, let’s pin down two facts.

a. In the last census only 2% of the UK’s population were recorded as homosexual. That doesn’t mean only 2% are interested in the matter, but this is not a major group. The BBC is a national broadcaster, its job is to serve the mainstream.

b. Nearly 60% of the UK’s population is Christian, and 4% are Muslim. Most Christians and Muslims believe in traditional morality. They believe that babies are born male or female (unlike Dawn Butler, surely a LGBT flat earther); and that a man and woman fall in love, marry, and have children. They do not believe in the LGBT creed that sexuality is fluid, it does not matter who you have sex with, and the overarching idea in LGBT ism that sex defines who you are. There are of course a few Christians and Muslims who align themselves with LGBT ism, and, don’t worry, the BBC will have a story about them. The point is as a national broadcaster, the BBC should be serving the 64%, not the 2%.

So what is happening here?

It’s obvious and it borders on the criminal.

A cultish clique has got hold of the editorial policy of the BBC and they are determined to push the LGBT message into the face of its readers and viewers. There is to be no escape. Ironically it was Andrew Marr, the BBC’s former political correspondent, who first blew the whistle on what most of us knew. He said there was a disproportionate number of gay people working for the BBC and they were neither fair nor impartial. He is right. In 2017 over 11 per cent of the BBC bosses were gay, and over 10 per cent of the staff. It’s not a small clique and it is massively disproportionate when the total number of homosexuals in the UK is about 2%.

And this borders on the criminal because the BBC is forcing money out of the pockets of millions of Christians and Muslims and using their money to push a creed that is deeply offensive to them and will – as sure as night follows day – be deeply harmful to the country.

Ah, but aren’t they impartial?

I challenge you to send me a BBC article that is seriously critical of LGBT ism, or a story reporting on someone turning their back on LGBT ism to live a normal life. There is nothing.

The BBC is anti-traditional morality and it is time decent ordinary people said enough is enough and stopped paying their licence fee.

Hopefully this threat will be enough for some wise and brave people at this once great organisation to clear out the stables and let the BBC get on with its mission as a national broadcaster, not a propagandist for LGBT ism.